We've had numerous issues in PouchDB due to subtle differences between Webpack and Browserify:
To deal with this, we've started testing Webpack separately in CI (pouchdb/pouchdb#4701),
We can look at two sides of the management coin: What do the individuals get out of it? And what benefit does the whole system derive from it?
I will disregard any benefits that accrue to managers just by holding the position of managing. Those are just circular logic. Circular logic abounds in discussions of management and hierarchy. For example, consider status reports. It will be said that status reports are necessary so managers know what their employees are working on. It’s
When the directory structure of your Node.js application (not library!) has some depth, you end up with a lot of annoying relative paths in your require calls like:
const Article = require('../../../../app/models/article');Those suck for maintenance and they're ugly.
Much like lots of other professions, the work of recruiters requires them to accost lots of people who don't necessarily want to be contacted. Therefore the goal is to say no in the nicest but firmest way, so that everyone can have a good weekend.
Researchers investigating the Rails parameter parsing vulnerability discovered that the same or similar vulnerable code had made its way into multiple other libraries. If your application uses these libraries to process untrusted data, it may still be vulnerable even if you have upgraded Rails. Check your Gemfile and Gemfile.lock for vulnerable versions of the following libraries.
Vulnerable: <= 3.2.10, <= 3.1.9, <= 3.0.18, <= 2.3.14
Fixed: 3.2.11, 3.1.10, 3.0.19, 2.3.15
