In the realm of self-improvement, hobbies and sports are often viewed as a means to grow personally, physically, or intellectually. However, not all hobbies are created equal when it comes to personal development. A thought-provoking observation suggests that activities can be categorized into those where it is easy to practice at the edge of one's ability and those where it is easy to practice at a level beyond or beneath one's abilities. This article explores this idea, its connection to the theory of deliberate practice, and how one might overcome the inherent challenges to achieve steady progression.
Disclaimer: The ideas presented here are observations and are subject to verification and validation.
In activities like running, yoga, and weight lifting, the margin for adjusting difficulty is narrow. You can easily measure your progress and push yourself incrementally. These activities allow for constant adaptation, making it easier to practice at the edge of one's ability, resulting in steady, linear progression.
On the other hand, activities like playing music, dancing, math, and programming are more nebulous in their metrics for success and can sometimes be too complex or too easy. This makes it more likely for individuals to hit plateaus, as they may not be consistently pushing their boundaries or may overshoot their capabilities.
The concept of deliberate practice, famously explored by psychologist K. Anders Ericsson, emphasizes that to achieve mastery, one must practice in a focused, goal-oriented way, continuously pushing the limits of one's ability. The first category of activities naturally lends itself to this principle, while the second category can make deliberate practice more challenging to implement.
To test the veracity of this observation, one could conduct longitudinal studies, comparing the rates of progress in both categories of activities. Interviews and psychological assessments could add another layer of understanding. Wearable technology that measures physical and cognitive exertion could also offer quantitative data.
If this theory holds water, those engaging in activities where plateaus are common could apply several strategies:
-
Structured Deliberate Practice: Identify the precise skills or elements you're lacking and work on those specifically.
-
Quantifiable Metrics: Try to establish measurable criteria for evaluating progress, even if the activity is qualitative in nature.
-
Feedback Loops: Regularly consult experts for evaluation and direction, ensuring you're on the right path.
-
Micro-Goals: Instead of broad objectives like "become a better musician," set small, achievable goals that stretch your skills.
-
Revisit Fundamentals: Sometimes going back to the basics can provide a fresh perspective and highlight areas for improvement.
While this observation is far from a definitive theory, it provides an intriguing framework to think about how we engage in our hobbies and sports. It nudges us to consider the design of our practice sessions and encourages us to find ways to ensure that we are always progressing, regardless of the inherent challenges presented by the activities we love.
In the quest for self-improvement, knowing how to efficiently invest our time and energy is half the battle. As we continue to explore this concept, we may find it to be a useful tool in that ever-important endeavor.